Generally speaking, the lens should expose one thing concerning the initial or “target” text that could never be otherwise obvious. Alternatively, your analysis may phone the credibility of this arguments regarding the lens piece into concern, expand the arguments of this lens text, or provoke various other reevaluation of this two texts. In any event, you will end up producing a critical “dialogue between texts.”
Reading the Texts
You read them is crucial since you will eventually want to hone in on points of commonality and discord between the two texts, the order and manner in which.
First, read the lens text to spot the core that is author’s and language. Since theoretical or critical texts are thick and complex, it could be useful to develop an overview of this author’s points that are primary. According the to Brandeis Writing Program Handbook, a lens that is valuable will “grapple with main ideas” of this lens text, in the place of working with remote quotes that will or may possibly not be indicative for the author’s argument in general. As a result, it is essential to ensure that you certainly comprehend and that can articulate the author’s points that are main continuing to your target text.
Upcoming, quickly see the target text to build up an idea that is general of content. Then, think about: Where do we see basic points of contract or disagreement involving the two texts? Which for the lens text’s arguments write my paper for me that are main be reproduced towards the target text? It may possibly be more straightforward to concentrate on 1 or 2 for the lens text’s arguments that are central.
With one of these some ideas at heart, return back and browse the target text very very carefully, through the lens that is theoretical thinking about listed here concerns: do you know the primary aspects of the lens text and exactly what are their complementary components within the target text? Continue Reading “This handout provides suggestions for writing papers or reactions that request you to evaluate a text through the lens of a vital or theoretical source that is secondary.”